Shared parent: Grateful Breath
Strain profile
Grateful Puff
0 BudWiki points0 research + 0 net votes × 25
Sourced lineage
Grateful Puff
Reported parentageGrateful Breath × Cherry Puff
- Listed THC
- 16–22%
- Top terpenes
- Not yet sourced
Flower profile
AllBud — Grateful Puff account · cuts and batches vary.
- Reported effectsCalming · Happy · Relaxing
- FlavorBerry · Cherry · Pine
- AromaEarthy · Fruity · Pungent
Leave a Review
One review per strain per account · 240 charactersLoading reviews…
Community reviews
Similar strains
Published family connections; batches may differ.
Shared lineage
Similar names
Names only; ancestry unconfirmed.
Named in these lineages · 2 strains
Source-reported family connections.
Kanna Beast’s reported version · Stock match unverifiedKanna Beast — exact Platinum Puff product, seller-reported parentage
Curio Wellness’s reported versionOfficial Curio Wellness strain page
Curio Wellness’s reported versionCurio Wellness — archived retailer product description
Sources and research notes
Parentage sources
Published cultivar reference
Leafly — published parentage referencePublished reference for this exact cultivar name; individual growers and batches may differ.
THC & terpenes
Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.
THC · AllBud
Grateful Puff
Cultivar profile header; published reference value, not an independently verified COA or guaranteed potency for a purchased batch.
Checked 2026-10-02Flower profile
AllBud — Grateful PuffAllBud’s published reports for Grateful Puff. Grower, selected cut and retail batch may differ. These are subjective reports, not laboratory findings or guaranteed effects.
Checked 2026-10-02Product photo
Source · AllBudPhoto published by AllBud.
AllBud labels this sample Grateful Puff and reports Grateful Breath × Cherry Puff, matching the frozen cultivar reference. Actual photographed grower, selected cut and retail batch are unreported. Six finite opening-image similarity leads were restored or physically available, individually viewed as whole originals, and found visually distinct; analytical similarity alone is not reuse proof. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.