Strain profile

Great White Shark

56 BudWiki points56 research + 0 net votes × 25

Sourced lineage

Great White Shark

Reported parentageSuper Skunk × White Widow
Listed THC
15–21%
Top terpenes
Myrcene · Pinene · Caryophyllene

Flower profile

AllBud — Great White Shark account · cuts and batches vary.

  • Reported effectsCreative · Euphoria · Happy
  • FlavorCitrus · Skunky · Sweet
  • AromaCitrus · Earthy · Fruity
Great White Shark harvested flower, as labeled by the cited photo source
Great White Shark · Flower

Leave a Review

One review per strain per account · 240 characters

Loading reviews…

Your rating

Community reviews

Similar strains

Published family connections; batches may differ.

Shared lineage
Similar names

Names only; ancestry unconfirmed.

Named in these lineages · 2 strains

Source-reported family connections.

Sources and research notes

Parentage sources

Published cultivar reference

Green House Seed Co. — Great White Shark breeder description

The breeder narrative explicitly states Super Skunk crossed with White Widow and explains its Brazilian × South Indian foundation.

THC & terpenes

Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.

THC · AllBud

Great White Shark

Cultivar profile header; published reference value, not an independently verified COA or guaranteed potency for a purchased batch.

Checked 2026-10-02
Terpenes · Leafly

Great White Shark

Leafly explicitly attributes this terpene data to products tested in Leafly Certified labs and reports three compounds in order. Unknown concentrations, sample counts and report dates remain null; no THC median is inferred.

Checked 2026-10-06

Flower profile

AllBud — Great White Shark

AllBud’s published reports for Great White Shark. Grower, selected cut and retail batch may differ. These are subjective reports, not laboratory findings or guaranteed effects.

Checked 2026-10-02

Product photo

Source · Hytiva

Photo published by Hytiva.

Exact directory review sample. Source references the 1997/2005 awards and Brazilian/South Indian foundation, compatible with supplied breeder narrative about White Widow foundation. It does not confirm the pictured grower or cut, and its broad ancestry prose is not used to replace breeder parentage. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.