Shared parent: Tropicanna
Strain profile
GushCanna
Sourced lineage
GushCanna
- Listed THC
- 25–28%
- Highest listed terpenes
- β-Caryophyllene 0.55% · Limonene 0.48% · Linalool 0.24%
Flower profile
AllBud — Gushcanna account · cuts and batches vary.
- Reported effectsEuphoria · Happy · Relaxing
- FlavorButtery · Candy · Citrus
- AromaBerry · Candy · Citrus

Leave a Review
One review per strain per account · 240 charactersLoading reviews…
Community reviews
Similar strains
Published family connections; batches may differ.
Shared lineage
Sources and research notes
Parentage sources
Published cultivar reference
AllBud — named cultivar referenceExact page heading and named description match. This reference does not confirm another grower, cut or batch.
THC & terpenes
Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.
Gushcanna
Cultivar profile header; published reference value, not an independently verified COA or guaranteed potency for a purchased batch.
Checked 2026-10-02Gushcanna · Fade Co.
Historical flower listing. Sorted descending among this listing’s reported terpene measurements; no COA or batch identity is established. Producer, harvest and test method can change the order. Not a universal cultivar profile or a current-stock claim. Listed sum 1.780% versus reported total 1.76%; panel completeness not established
Captured 2026-09-08Flower profile
AllBud — GushcannaAllBud’s published reports for Gushcanna. Grower, selected cut and retail batch may differ. These are subjective reports, not laboratory findings or guaranteed effects.
Checked 2026-10-02Product photo
Source · Reddit · u/Curious-Way69 · r/MDEntsPhoto published by Reddit · u/Curious-Way69 · r/MDEnts.
Post title names Gushcanna. Its second gallery image is packaging labelled Fade Co Gushcanna, cultivated by Seven Points Agro Therapeutic; this supports only the posted sample attribution. The post does not establish the existing Gushers × Tropicanna account, breeder, selected cut or actual genotype. No genetic equivalence is claimed. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.