Reported parent: ’92 OG Kush
Strain profile
Kurple Fantasy
Sourced lineage
Kurple Fantasy
- Listed THC
- 23%
- Top terpenes
- Limonene · Caryophyllene · Linalool
Flower profile
AllBud — Kurple Fantasy account · cuts and batches vary.
- Reported effectsBody High · Creative · Euphoria
- FlavorBerry · Diesel · Grape
- AromaFruity · Skunky · Sweet

Leave a Review
One review per strain per account · 240 charactersLoading reviews…
Community reviews
Similar strains
Published family connections; batches may differ.
Shared lineage
Named in these lineages · 2 strains
Source-reported family connections.
Sources and research notes
Parentage sources
Published cultivar reference
Leafly — Kurple Fantasy parentage referenceAttributed publisher account; not independent breeder verification or proof of another grower, cut or batch. Publisher breeder attribution: Imperial Genetics.
THC & terpenes
Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.
Kurple Fantasy
AllBud's Kurple Fantasy narrative reports 23% THC. Its source version speculates about Purple Urkle × OG Kush and explicitly says the lineage is uncertain; this is kept separate from Imperial Genetics '92 OG Kush × Old Man Purps account. Publisher-reported point without an original COA, grower authentication or universal potency guarantee.
Captured 2026-10-02Kurple Fantasy
Leafly reports this leading-three group for Kurple Fantasy. Source edition: Imperial Genetics; '92 OG Kush × Old Man Purps. Names only; no original COA, concentrations, current-stock match, grower authentication or genotype equivalence to another named edition is established.
Checked 2026-10-02Flower profile
AllBud — Kurple FantasyAllBud’s published reports for Kurple Fantasy. Grower, selected cut and retail batch may differ. These are subjective reports, not laboratory findings or guaranteed effects.
Checked 2026-10-02Product photo
Source · AllBudPhoto published by AllBud.
The directory explicitly labels Purple Urkle × OG Kush as speculation and says lineage is lost to history. This photograph does not resolve that uncertainty. Published attribution does not establish DNA identity, selected cut, chemistry or unreported batch equivalence. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.