Strain profile

LA Sherb Cake

52 BudWiki points52 research + 0 net votes × 25

Parentage research

LA Sherb Cake

Reported parentageNot yet verified
Historical THC
25.44%
Highest listed terpenes
Limonene 0.44% · β-Caryophyllene 0.35% · Linalool 0.26%

Flower profile

  • Reported effectsNot yet sourced
  • FlavorNot yet sourced
  • AromaNot yet sourced
LA Sherb Cake harvested flower, as labeled by the cited photo source
LA Sherb Cake · FlowerFade Co.

Leave a Review

One review per strain per account · 240 characters

Loading reviews…

Your rating

Community reviews

Similar strains

Published family connections; batches may differ.

Shared lineage

No unambiguous parent or selection matches are available yet.

Similar names

Names only; ancestry unconfirmed.

Sources and research notes

Parentage sources

A general cultivar reference has not yet been established for this exact name. Retailer-specific parentage is not treated as a universal strain pedigree.

THC & terpenes

Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.

THC · Goldleaf

LA Sherb Cake · Fade Co.

One historical flower listing. The source description explicitly labels this percentage THC. It lists THC9, THCA separately; these labels have not been combined or converted. Source-reported brand; grower and COA are not independently verified. This listing does not establish a cultivar-wide potency range.

Captured 2026-09-08
Terpenes · Goldleaf

LA Sherb Cake · Fade Co.

Historical flower listing. Sorted descending among this listing’s reported terpene measurements; no COA or batch identity is established. Producer, harvest and test method can change the order. Not a universal cultivar profile or a current-stock claim. Listed sum 1.500% versus reported total 1.49%; panel completeness not established

Captured 2026-09-08

Product photo

Source · GOLDLEAF

Photo published by GOLDLEAF.

GOLDLEAF’s exact LA Sherb Cake Fade Co. Smalls product binds its OG image, which literally labels LA Sherb Cake. Retained parentage and source parentage are unpublished; no cross is inferred. Retailer/brand/grower roles remain distinct. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.