Strain profile

Prizm

99 BudWiki points99 research + 0 net votes × 25

Sourced lineage

Prizm

Reported parentageOpal × Permanent Marker #12
Historical THC
28.523%total THC
Top terpenes
Not yet sourced

Flower profile

Maven Genetics account · cuts and batches vary.

  • FlavorNot yet sourced
  • AromaClean, astringent chemical-like scent · Pine needles · Citrus candy
  • AppearanceShimmering, spade-shaped buds
Prizm harvested flower, as labeled by the cited photo source
Prizm · FlowerMaven Genetics

Leave a Review

One review per strain per account · 240 characters

Loading reviews…

Your rating

Community reviews

Similar strains

Published family connections; batches may differ.

Shared lineage
Named in these lineages · 2 strains

Source-reported family connections.

Sources and research notes

Parentage sources

Maven Genetics’s reported version

Leafly — Maven Genetics Prizm brand description

Explicit cultivar description reviewed; attributed source account.

THC & terpenes

Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.

THC · King's Crew

MAVEN - INDOOR FLOWER - PRIZM - 3.5G · MAVEN

One historical flower listing, as labelled by the source. source brand field; grower not independently established. THCA is listed separately and has not been combined with THC. No independent COA verification or cultivar-wide potency range.

Captured 2026-09-10

Flower profile

Leafly

Exact Maven Genetics California Prizm 3.5 g flower product on Leafly, matching the owner's historical MAVEN indoor flower Prizm 3.5 g label. Opening-jar scent and spade-shaped shimmering buds are explicit; floral taste and lemon-diesel smoke are excluded. Source product/selection label: Prizm [3.5g].

Checked 2026-10-05

Product photo

Source · Maven Genetics

Photo published by Maven Genetics.

One Maven Genetics published Prizm flower photograph. Its own grower product/cultivar identity only; no guarantee about other growers, batches or unestablished cuts. Gallery filename numbers are retained in evidence and not interpreted as a runtime strain rename. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.