Strain profile

Fat Billy

65 BudWiki points65 research + 0 net votes × 25

Sourced lineage

Fat Billy

Reported parentageGMO × Wilson
Historical THC
26.15%
Top terpenes
Not yet sourced

Flower profile

Leafly — Fat Billy account · cuts and batches vary.

  • Reported effectsEuphoric · Energetic · Giggly
  • FlavorRose · Diesel · Mint
  • AromaGassy · Fruity
Fat Billy harvested flower, as labeled by the cited photo source
Fat Billy · Flower

Leave a Review

One review per strain per account · 240 characters

Loading reviews…

Your rating

Community reviews

Similar strains

Published family connections; batches may differ.

Shared lineage
Similar names

Names only; ancestry unconfirmed.

Sources and research notes

Parentage sources

Published cultivar reference

Leafly — Fat Billy parentage reference

Attributed publisher account for this named cultivar; not independent breeder verification or proof of another grower’s seed line, selected cut, or batch. The publisher attributes this version to The Holding Company. The same page’s Parent cards name Wilson, GMOG. Their wording is retained separately; it is not used to silently alter the prose’s parent names or selected-cut qualifiers.

THC & terpenes

Sample and producer versions may differ. These references do not predict another batch’s contents.

THC · JARS Cannabis – Lansing

Fat Billy Whole Flower Ounce

One historical flower listing, as labelled by the source. producer not established. No independent COA verification or cultivar-wide potency range.

Captured 2026-09-11

Flower profile

Leafly — Fat Billy

Leafly’s published reports for Fat Billy. Leafly reports reader experiences and publisher descriptions for this named reference. Grower, selected cut and retail batch may differ. These are subjective reports, not laboratory findings or guaranteed effects.

Checked 2026-10-03

Product photo

Source · Illinois News Joint

Photo published by Illinois News Joint.

July 2023 Illinois RYTHM branded eighth reviewed from Rise Effingham. Original review reports GMO and Wilson; actual cultivation license/entity is not established by the review, so producer is null. This is an original reviewer photo composite, with package and text alongside real sample nugs; it is not a plain isolated nug photograph. Source attribution is not genetic testing or proof of the same retail batch.